Stifel Client Account Access:  LOG IN          ● 1 Consolidate 2 Manage 3 Retire Well ●                    Contact Us

  ROLLOVER CENTER
   
  STIFEL                Retirement
  NICOLAUS                 Plans Quarterly
   

                                                                            Second Quarter 2007

 

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION ISSUE CLARIFIED FOR NON-SPOUSE IRA BENEFICIARIES

Under the provisions of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA 2006), a non-spouse beneficiary of a qualified retirement plan (QRP), including governmental 457(b), 403(a), and 403(b) plans, is now allowed to roll inherited QRP assets into a beneficiary IRA (effective for distributions after December 31, 2006). Once QRP assets are received into the beneficiary IRA account, all IRA Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules for non-spouse beneficiaries apply. The beneficiary may select from the following three IRA payout options:

� Total distribution � The entire balance of the inherited IRA is distributed to the beneficiary by December 31 of the year following the year of the QRP participant�s death.

� Life expectancy payments � Taken at least annually based on the single life expectancy of the beneficiary as determined in the year following the year of the QRP participant�s death.

� The five-year rule � The entire balance of the beneficiary IRA must be distributed before the end of the fifth year following the year of the QRP participant�s death. This option is only available if the QRP participant died before his or her Required Minimum Distribution beginning date, which is the later of April 1 of the year following the year the participant would have turned age 70 � or April 1 of the year following the year of retirement (not an option for individuals who own 5% or more of the company).

A beneficiary has until December 31 of the year following the year of the QRP / IRA owner�s death to elect one of the options. If no election is made, distributions will be calculated under the "life expectancy" rules.

Switching from the five-year rule

Often QRPs require a non-spouse beneficiary to distribute the entire balance under the five-year rule after the death of the plan participant without a "life expectancy" option. The IRS recently clarified in Notice 2007-7, Miscellaneous Pension Protection Act Changes, dated February 13, 2007, "if the 5-year rule applies in the QRP, the non-spouse designated beneficiary may determine the required minimum distribution under the plan (IRA) using the life expectancy rule in the case of a distribution made prior to the end of the year following the year of death." This allows a QRP non-spouse beneficiary to switch to life expectancy payments if the rollover from the QRP to the inherited IRA is completed by December 31 of the year following the year of the plan participant�s death. If a rollover is not completed by this date, a beneficiary may still roll the assets into an inherited beneficiary IRA, but they will be required to distribute the entire balance according to the five-year rule.

For additional information, access the IRS web site: www.irs.gov.

TRANSFERRING INHERITED BENEFICIARY IRAs

 

      2nd Quarter 2007

As IRA beneficiaries seek additional investments or services that may not be available from the institution where their IRA is held, the transfer of an inherited beneficiary IRA from one institution to another is becoming an increasingly common request. This is especially true in the event the institution holding the deceased individual�s IRA account:

1. Is located in an area not near or convenient to the beneficiary(ies).

2. Offers a limited number of investment options, such as certificates of deposit.

3. Has limited processing capabilities, such as the ability to separate deceased IRA holder accounts into multiple beneficiary accounts for the purpose of individual beneficiary distribution elections.

Although the provisions of PPA 2006 now allow non-spouse beneficiaries of QRPs to roll inherited QRP assets into beneficiary IRAs (see previous article), the Internal Revenue Code offers no guidance on whether a beneficiary may move the IRA of a deceased individual to a different financial organization and continue to maintain it in the name of the deceased IRA holder.

 

 

Private Letter Rulings (PLRs)

In cases where there is limited guidance, many individuals have sought assistance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by submitting PLRs. A PLR is a ruling issued by the IRS addressing a tax situation of a particular taxpayer. Although PLRs contain the cautionary language that the ruling is intended to apply only to the individual who sought it, and not to be applied to other cases, PLRs do give an indication of the IRS�s current position toward a particular type of transaction or situation.

For example, in one case an IRA owner died before his required beginning date (RBD) and a non-spouse was named as the sole beneficiary of the IRA. With life expectancy payouts required to begin by December 31 of the second year of the IRA owner�s death, the beneficiary requested IRS approval to transfer the IRA to a new IRA custodian. The new IRA would be established in the name of the decedent, at another institution located in the home state of the beneficiary. Convenience was given as the reason for the transfer, and the IRS approved the trustee-to-trustee transfer.

An IRA is a legal trust, and to establish a trust, the individual must sign appropriate documents adopting the terms of the trust. Obviously, a deceased individual cannot sign the documents to establish a new IRA at the receiving financial organization. State trust laws generally govern IRA trusts, but the IRS does not address the issue of the creation of a trust for a decedent. Whether the trust laws of a given state allow it is a matter that should be addressed by legal counsel.

Although PLRs consistently indicate the IRS has taken a position that a beneficiary may transfer an inherited IRA to another institution, a safe way to proceed would be the application for an individually approved PLR.

IRA BALANCES AGGREGATED FOR ROTH CONVERSIONS

A conversion to a Roth IRA is technically a distribution from a Traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE (after two years) IRA and a rollover to a Roth IRA. Under IRC Section 408(d)(2), the values of all IRAs (not including Roth IRAs) are aggregated and treated as one IRA for purposes of determining taxation of distributions. For example, if an individual has an IRA that consists of pre-tax dollars valued at $100,000 and another "non-deductible IRA" valued at $5,000 (no earnings), $105,000 must be the value used to determine the taxable portion of a distribution from either of the IRAs. In this case, if the individual intends to convert $5,000 to a Roth IRA, the non-taxable portion of the Traditional IRA distribution is calculated in the following manner:

After-tax value ($5,000) divided by the aggregated IRA value ($105,000) times the distribution amount ($5,000) equals the non-taxable portion of this distribution ($238.09). The taxable portion of the distribution in this conversion example is $4,761.91.

Caution for Roth conversions in 2010

Currently, individuals with over $100,000 in adjusted gross income (AGI) are not eligible to convert IRAs to Roth IRAs. However,

the AGI restriction will be eliminated, starting in 2010. This will allow taxpayers with AGI of $100,000 or more to convert their Traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE IRAs to Roth IRAs in 2010 and beyond. Although the AGI restriction for conversion eligibility will be eliminated, the IRA aggregation rules explained above will still apply.

ROTH CONVERTERS BEWARE OF PENALTIES

When converting from a Traditional to a Roth IRA, tax is due on the entire distribution amount in the year of the distribution. However, many individuals are unaware that estimated tax payments may be due on the converted amount prior to the normal tax filing deadline. Tax filers that converted Traditional IRA assets to Roth IRAs may be facing penalties for underpayments of estimated income tax payments, for many did not plan accordingly for a substantial increase in adjusted gross income due to the conversion.

An IRS formula determines whether a tax filer meets the requirements for payment of estimated taxes, either through withholding on taxable income received or by remittance of estimated tax payments sent directly to the IRS by the tax filer.

Numerous tax filers who were assessed underpayment penalties for deficient estimated tax payments for Roth conversion amounts requested relief from the IRS. A Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 200105062) indicated that the IRS may not grant relief to tax filers assessed penalties for failing to comply with estimated income tax rules (IRC Sec. 6654).

To determine if you are required to pay estimated taxes, consult your CPA or a competent tax advisor for guidance.

FINAL ROTH 401K DISTRIBUTION GUIDANCE RELEASED

The IRS recently issued final regulations under Section 402A of the Internal Revenue Code that provides guidance on the taxation of Roth 401K and 403(b) distributions.

The regulations provide guidance on determining the 5-tax-year holding period for "qualified distributions." A qualified distribution is one that is made after the employee has held the designated Roth account for at least 5 tax years and is either made after the employee�s attainment of age 59 �, attributable to the employee�s disability, or made after the employee�s death. The 5-year period begins on the first day of the calendar year in which the employee first had Roth contributions made to the plan and ends when five consecutive tax years have been completed. For example, if a participant first makes Roth 401K contributions on June 1, 2007, the participant�s five-year holding period would begin on January 1, 2007, and end on December 31, 2011.

The regulations also provide clarification with regards to rollovers. First, the regulations provide that rollovers of basis in a designated Roth account to a designated Roth account in another plan must be accomplished via a direct rollover.

Secondly, there was confusion as to when the 5-tax-year holding period began when a designated Roth account was rolled

 

over from one plan to another. The regulations state that if an employee rolls over a designated Roth account from their previous employer to their new employer�s plan the 5-tax-year period for the recipient plan begins on the first day of the employee�s tax year for which the employee first had designated Roth contributions made to the prior plan, if earlier. In order to determine that date, the plan administrator of a plan directly rolling over a distribution is required to provide the administrator of the recipient plan with a statement indicating either: (1) the first year of the 5-tax-year period for the employee and the portion of such distribution attributable to basis or (2) that the distribution is a qualified distribution. If the distribution is not directly rolled over to another eligible plan, this same information must be provided to the employee, except it will not need to include the first year of the 5-tax-year period.

The final regulations are effective April 30, 2007, and generally apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.

PENSION PROTECTION ACT EFFECT ON PENSION LUMP-SUM DISTRIBUTIONS

Many traditional pension plans offer retirees the option of taking a lump-sum distribution rather than a lifetime annuity payment. If the lump-sum option is selected, the interest rate at the time has an effect on the payout. This is because the regulations provide that lump-sum distributions must be actuarially equivalent to the life annuity benefit. The actuarial equivalence is calculated using interest rates and mortality assumptions specified by law.

The current interest rate used in the actuarial equivalence calculation is the 30-year Treasury, but that will change with the recent passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Starting in 2008, pension plans will be required to start phasing in an interest rate based on investment grade corporate bonds. As a general rule, the corporate bond rate will have a higher interest rate than the 30-year Treasury rate, which leads to a smaller lump-sum distribution.

The interest rate change will be phased in over time and take full effect in 2012. For distributions in 2008-2011, a weighted average of the current 30-year Treasury rate and the new corporate bond rate will be used in the calculation of lump-sum distributions.

Corporate Bond Phase-In Schedule

  30-year Treasury Rate Corporate Bond Rate
2007 100% 0%
2008 80% 20%
2009 60% 40%
2010 40% 60%
2011 20% 80%
2012 0% 100%

According to Deloitte Consulting, the interest rate changes could result in an approximately 2 to 3 percent reduction in lump-sum amounts paid in 2008.

 

REASONABLE RATE FOR PARTICIPANT LOANS

What is a reasonable rate of interest for participant loans? It depends on whether you ask the Department of Labor (DOL) or the IRS.

The DOL regulations provide that a reasonable rate of interest is one that must be commensurate with the rates charged by commercial lenders for loans made under similar circumstances. This seems to indicate that credit worthiness of the borrower should be considered when setting the interest rate of the loan. In fact, the DOL has indicated that loans charging less interest relative to their risk could be considered imprudent under ERISA, even though the loan is secured by the participant�s vested interest in the plan.

The DOL is also on record as rejecting industry comments that a reference to "prime" or other such industry standard should be deemed reasonable.

In the eyes of the DOL, a reasonable rate of interest would require the plan administrator to survey the interest rates charged by commercial lenders in the area and using the average interest rate from the survey.

It is interesting to note that the DOL does not have a safe harbor for determining a reasonable rate of interest, which could make enforcement difficult.

The IRS has a completely different opinion of what constitutes a reasonable rate of interest. They have traditionally accepted a rate based on a recognized standard, such as the prime rate. The prime rate plus 1% or 2% has been the standard rate accepted by the IRS. In fact, it is documented that during the 1990s IRS examiners were seeking prime plus 2% as the standard.

The IRS has indicated that they would enforce any safe harbor regulation released by the DOL regarding the interest rate for plan loans.

Unfortunately plan sponsors must use their best judgment until such regulations are proposed by the DOL.

FORM 5500 DEADLINE APPROACHES FOR CALENDAR YEAR PLANS

ERISA generally requires the administrator of an employer sponsored Qualified Retirement Plan to submit an annual report which contains information on the characteristics and financial operations of the plan. This annual report is completed on Form 5500 and is filed with the Department of Labor�s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). EBSA provides information from the reports to the IRS and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) for use in enforcement.

The Form 5500 is generally due by the last day of the seventh month after the end of the plan year. Thus, the deadline for 2006 calendar year plans is July 31, 2007. One of the most serious offenses that a plan sponsor or plan administrator can commit is failure to file Form 5500. The IRS can impose a penalty of $25 per day up to $15,000, and the Department of Labor and the PBGC can each charge up to $1,100 per day. Also, any incorrect

 

 

or inconsistent data could trigger an audit of the plan and could ultimately disqualify the tax-deferred status of the plan.

For more information about the Form 5500 filing, go to the EBSA website at www.dol.gov/ebsa or call 1-866-444-3272.

IRS AND DOL FORM 5500 FILING TIPS

The IRS and Department of Labor (DOL) have compiled a list of the most frequent Form 5500 filing errors.

� Failure to sign and date the form and any schedules that require a signature.

� Failure to provide the proper Employee Identification Number (EIN) and Plan Number.

� Filing for a period of more than 12 months.

� Filing a Form 5500 as a "Final Return/Report" if the plan has assets, liabilities, or participants at the end of the plan year.

� Failure to provide a proper business code � a listing of business codes is provided in the Form 5500 Instructions booklet.

� Failure to provide the correct plan characteristic codes � a listing of characteristic codes is provided in the Form 5500 Instructions booklet.

� Failure to file all applicable schedules and attachments.

� Failure to file the appropriate Financial Information schedule. Schedule I is generally for plans with 100 or fewer participants, while Schedule H is for plans with more than 100 participants.

� Incomplete Form 5500.

Additional information can be found in the DOL�s Trouble Shooter�s Guide to Filing the ERISA Annual Report (Form 5500), which is available on the DOL web site at www.dol.gov/ebsa.

 

 

COMMON 404(c) MISTAKES

Section 404(c) of ERISA protects a qualified plan fiduciary against liability for investment losses arising from investment choices and asset allocations. While most plan sponsors comply with 404(c) by allowing the participants to direct the investments of their accounts in a broad range of investment alternatives, many fail to comply with other aspects of 404(c). According to ERISA Attorneys Fred Reish and Bruce Ashton (www.reish.com), the following are some of the 404(c) requirements that plans commonly fail to satisfy:

1. Failure to tell participants that the plan intends to comply with 404(c). If a plan fails to state that it intends to comply with 404(c) and that by complying this will relieve fiduciaries of liability for participant investment decisions, the fiduciaries lose 404(c) protection even if all of the requirements are met. Starting next year, this statement must be in the plan�s Summary Plan Description (SPD).

2. Failure to inform the participants of the fiduciary responsible for ensuring 404(c) compliance and for providing information about the plan, such as a plan document or prospectus. The regulations require that participants be given the name, address, and phone number of this fiduciary. In many cases the fiduciary will be named in the SPD by their position, e.g., Benefits Director, rather than by name.

3. Failure to give participants copies of fund prospectuses and information regarding the exercise of voting, tender, and similar shareholder rights where a plan invests directly in designated mutual funds. Under the regulation, the plan must provide these materials only if they are received from the mutual fund. Federal securities laws require mutual funds to send this information to shareholders, and a qualified plan is a "shareholder."

By complying with 404(c), plan sponsors can transfer the legal responsibility for investment decisions to the participants. It is important to note that 404(c) does not relieve fiduciaries of all liability of plan investments. The fiduciaries remain responsible for selecting and monitoring the plan�s investment options. Plan sponsors should review their 404(c) compliance procedures to ensure they are not committing any breaches.

 

 

 

The information contained in this newsletter has been carefully compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy of the information is not guaranteed. This newsletter is distributed with the understanding that the publisher is not engaging in any legal or accounting type of work such as practicing law or CPA services.

STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED

Member SIPC and New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

National Headquarters: One Financial Plaza � 501 North Broadway � St. Louis, Missouri 63102

(314) 342-2000 � www.stifel.com

Investment Services Since 1890

          Rollover Center Home
  401(k) ROLLOVERS
      Order Rollover Kit
 What is a 401(k) Rollover?
 How Do I Start a Rollover?
  ROLLOVER IRAs
  Traditional IRA
  Roth IRA
  Which IRA is Best? 
  Investment Options
  Contribution Limits
  PLANNING
  Retirement Planning
  Estate Planning
  Wealth Tracker
  Wealth Strategist
  RESOURCES
  Search FAQs
  About Us