ROLLOVER
CENTER |
|
|
STIFEL |
Retirement |
NICOLAUS |
Plans Quarterly |
|
Second Quarter 2007
REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION ISSUE
CLARIFIED FOR NON-SPOUSE IRA BENEFICIARIES
Under the provisions of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (PPA 2006), a non-spouse beneficiary of a
qualified retirement plan (QRP), including governmental 457(b),
403(a), and 403(b) plans, is now allowed to roll inherited QRP assets
into a beneficiary IRA (effective for distributions after December 31,
2006). Once QRP assets are received into the beneficiary IRA account,
all IRA Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules for non-spouse
beneficiaries apply. The beneficiary may select from the following
three IRA payout options:
� Total distribution � The entire balance
of the inherited IRA is distributed to the beneficiary by December 31
of the year following the year of the QRP participant�s death.
� Life expectancy payments � Taken at
least annually based on the single life expectancy of the beneficiary
as determined in the year following the year of the QRP participant�s
death.
� The five-year rule � The entire balance
of the beneficiary IRA must be distributed before the end of the fifth
year following the year of the QRP participant�s death. This option is
only available if the QRP participant died before his or her Required
Minimum Distribution beginning date, which is the later of April 1 of
the year following the year the participant would have turned age 70 �
or April 1 of the year following the year of retirement (not an option
for individuals who own 5% or more of the company).
A beneficiary has until December 31 of the
year following the year of the QRP / IRA owner�s death to elect one of
the options. If no election is made, distributions will be calculated
under the "life expectancy" rules.
Switching from the five-year rule
Often QRPs require a non-spouse
beneficiary to distribute the entire balance under the five-year rule
after the death of the plan participant without a "life expectancy"
option. The IRS recently clarified in Notice 2007-7, Miscellaneous
Pension Protection Act Changes, dated February 13, 2007, "if the
5-year rule applies in the QRP, the non-spouse designated beneficiary
may determine the required minimum distribution under the plan (IRA)
using the life expectancy rule in the case of a distribution made
prior to the end of the year following the year of death." This allows
a QRP non-spouse beneficiary to switch to life expectancy payments if
the rollover from the QRP to the inherited IRA is completed by
December 31 of the year following the year of the plan participant�s
death. If a rollover is not completed by this date, a beneficiary may
still roll the assets into an inherited beneficiary IRA, but they will
be required to distribute the entire balance according to the
five-year rule.
For additional information, access the IRS
web site: www.irs.gov.
TRANSFERRING INHERITED BENEFICIARY IRAs
|
2nd Quarter 2007 |
As IRA beneficiaries seek additional
investments or services that may not be available from the institution
where their IRA is held, the transfer of an inherited beneficiary IRA
from one institution to another is becoming an increasingly common
request. This
is especially true in the event the institution holding
the deceased individual�s IRA account:
1. Is located in an area not near or
convenient to the beneficiary(ies).
2. Offers a limited number of investment
options, such as certificates of deposit.
3. Has limited processing capabilities,
such as the ability to separate deceased IRA holder accounts into
multiple beneficiary accounts for the purpose of individual
beneficiary distribution elections.
Although the provisions of PPA 2006 now
allow non-spouse beneficiaries of QRPs to roll inherited QRP assets
into beneficiary IRAs (see previous article), the Internal Revenue
Code offers no guidance on whether a beneficiary may move the IRA of a
deceased individual to a different financial organization and continue
to maintain it in the name of the deceased IRA holder.
|
|
Private Letter Rulings (PLRs)
In cases where there is limited guidance, many individuals have
sought assistance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by
submitting PLRs. A PLR is a ruling issued by the IRS addressing a
tax situation of a particular taxpayer. Although PLRs contain the
cautionary language that the ruling is intended to apply only to
the individual who sought it, and not to be applied to other
cases, PLRs do give an indication of the IRS�s current position
toward a particular type of transaction or situation.
For example, in one case an IRA owner died before his required
beginning date (RBD) and a non-spouse was named as the sole
beneficiary of the IRA. With life expectancy payouts required to
begin by December 31 of the second year of the IRA owner�s death,
the beneficiary requested IRS approval to transfer the IRA to a
new IRA custodian. The new IRA would be established in the name of
the decedent, at another institution located in the home state of
the beneficiary. Convenience was given as the reason for the
transfer, and the IRS approved the trustee-to-trustee transfer.
An IRA is a legal trust, and to establish a trust, the
individual must sign appropriate documents adopting the terms of
the trust. Obviously, a deceased individual cannot sign the
documents to establish a new IRA at the receiving financial
organization. State trust laws generally govern IRA trusts, but
the IRS does not address the issue of the creation of a trust for
a decedent. Whether the trust laws of a given state allow it is a
matter that should be addressed by legal counsel.
Although PLRs consistently indicate the IRS has taken a
position that a beneficiary may transfer an inherited IRA to
another institution, a safe way to proceed would be the
application for an individually approved PLR.
IRA BALANCES AGGREGATED FOR ROTH CONVERSIONS
A conversion to a Roth IRA is technically a distribution from a
Traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE (after two years) IRA and a rollover
to a Roth IRA. Under IRC Section 408(d)(2), the values of all IRAs
(not including Roth IRAs) are aggregated and treated as one IRA
for purposes of determining taxation of distributions. For
example, if an individual has an IRA that consists of pre-tax
dollars valued at $100,000 and another "non-deductible IRA" valued
at $5,000 (no earnings), $105,000 must be the value used to
determine the taxable portion of a distribution from either of the
IRAs. In this case, if the individual intends to convert $5,000 to
a Roth IRA, the non-taxable portion of the Traditional IRA
distribution is calculated in the following manner:
After-tax value ($5,000) divided by the aggregated IRA value
($105,000) times the distribution amount ($5,000) equals the
non-taxable portion of this distribution ($238.09). The taxable
portion of the distribution in this conversion example is
$4,761.91.
Caution for Roth conversions in 2010
Currently, individuals with over $100,000 in adjusted gross
income (AGI) are not eligible to convert IRAs to Roth IRAs.
However,
|
the AGI restriction will be
eliminated, starting in 2010. This will allow taxpayers with AGI
of $100,000 or more to convert their Traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE
IRAs to Roth IRAs in 2010
and beyond. Although the AGI restriction for
conversion eligibility will be eliminated, the IRA aggregation
rules explained above will still apply.
ROTH CONVERTERS BEWARE OF PENALTIES
When converting from a Traditional to
a Roth IRA, tax is due on the entire distribution amount in the
year of the distribution. However, many individuals are unaware
that estimated tax payments may be due on the converted amount
prior to the normal tax filing deadline. Tax filers that converted
Traditional IRA assets to Roth IRAs may be facing penalties for
underpayments of estimated income tax payments, for many did not
plan accordingly for a substantial increase in adjusted gross
income due to the conversion.
An IRS formula determines whether a
tax filer meets the requirements for payment of estimated taxes,
either through withholding on taxable income received or by
remittance of estimated tax payments sent directly to the IRS by
the tax filer.
Numerous tax filers who were assessed
underpayment penalties for deficient estimated tax payments for
Roth conversion amounts requested relief from the IRS. A Chief
Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 200105062) indicated that the IRS
may not grant relief to tax filers assessed penalties for failing
to comply with estimated income tax rules (IRC Sec. 6654).
To determine if you are required to
pay estimated taxes, consult your CPA or a competent tax advisor
for guidance.
FINAL ROTH 401K DISTRIBUTION
GUIDANCE RELEASED
The IRS recently issued final
regulations under Section 402A of the Internal Revenue Code that
provides guidance on the taxation of Roth 401K and 403(b)
distributions.
The regulations provide guidance on
determining the 5-tax-year holding period for "qualified
distributions." A qualified distribution is one that is made after
the employee has held the designated Roth account for at least 5
tax years and is either made after the employee�s attainment of
age 59 �, attributable to the employee�s disability, or made after
the employee�s death. The 5-year period begins on the first day of
the calendar year in which the employee first had Roth
contributions made to the plan and ends when five consecutive tax
years have been completed. For example, if a participant first
makes Roth 401K contributions on June 1, 2007, the participant�s
five-year holding period would begin on January 1, 2007, and end
on December 31, 2011.
The regulations also provide
clarification with regards to rollovers. First, the regulations
provide that rollovers of basis in a designated Roth account to a
designated Roth account in another plan must be accomplished via a
direct rollover.
Secondly, there was confusion as to
when the 5-tax-year holding period began when a designated Roth
account was rolled
|
|
over from one plan to another. The
regulations state that if an employee rolls over a designated Roth
account from their previous employer to their new employer�s plan
the 5-tax-year period for the recipient plan begins on the first
day of the employee�s tax year for which the employee first had
designated Roth contributions made to the prior plan, if earlier.
In order to determine that date, the plan administrator of a plan
directly rolling over a distribution is required to provide the
administrator of the recipient plan with a statement indicating
either: (1) the first year of the 5-tax-year period for the
employee and the portion of such distribution attributable to
basis or (2) that the distribution is a qualified distribution. If
the distribution is not directly rolled over to another eligible
plan, this same information must be provided to the employee,
except it will not need to include the first year of the
5-tax-year period.
The final regulations are effective
April 30, 2007, and generally apply to taxable years beginning on
or after January 1, 2007.
PENSION PROTECTION ACT EFFECT ON
PENSION LUMP-SUM DISTRIBUTIONS
Many traditional pension plans offer
retirees the option of taking a lump-sum distribution rather than
a lifetime annuity payment. If the lump-sum option is selected,
the interest rate at the time has an effect on the payout. This is
because the regulations provide that lump-sum distributions must
be actuarially equivalent to the life annuity benefit. The
actuarial equivalence is calculated using interest rates and
mortality assumptions specified by law.
The current interest rate used in the
actuarial equivalence calculation is the 30-year Treasury, but
that will change with the recent passage of the Pension Protection
Act of 2006. Starting in 2008, pension plans will be required to
start phasing in an interest rate based on investment grade
corporate bonds. As a general rule, the corporate bond rate will
have a higher interest rate than the 30-year Treasury rate, which
leads to a smaller lump-sum distribution.
The interest rate change will be
phased in over time and take full effect in 2012. For
distributions in 2008-2011, a weighted average of the current
30-year Treasury rate and the new corporate bond rate will be used
in the calculation of lump-sum distributions.
Corporate Bond Phase-In Schedule
|
30-year Treasury
Rate |
Corporate Bond
Rate |
2007 |
100% |
0% |
2008 |
80% |
20% |
2009 |
60% |
40% |
2010 |
40% |
60% |
2011 |
20% |
80% |
2012 |
0% |
100% |
According to Deloitte Consulting, the
interest rate changes could result in an approximately 2 to 3
percent reduction in lump-sum amounts paid in 2008.
|
REASONABLE RATE FOR PARTICIPANT LOANS
What is a reasonable rate of interest
for participant loans? It depends on whether you ask the
Department of Labor (DOL) or the IRS.
The DOL regulations provide that a
reasonable rate of interest is one that must be commensurate with
the rates charged by commercial lenders for loans made under
similar circumstances. This seems to indicate that credit
worthiness of the borrower should be considered when setting the
interest rate of the loan. In fact, the DOL has indicated that
loans charging less interest relative to their risk could be
considered imprudent under ERISA, even though the loan is secured
by the participant�s vested interest in the plan.
The DOL is also on record as rejecting
industry comments that a reference to "prime" or other such
industry standard should be deemed reasonable.
In the eyes of the DOL, a reasonable
rate of interest would require the plan administrator to survey
the interest rates charged by commercial lenders in the area and
using the average interest rate from the survey.
It is interesting to note that the DOL
does not have a safe harbor for determining a reasonable rate of
interest, which could make enforcement difficult.
The IRS has a completely different
opinion of what constitutes a reasonable rate of interest. They
have traditionally accepted a rate based on a recognized standard,
such as the prime rate. The prime rate plus 1% or 2% has been the
standard rate accepted by the IRS. In fact, it is documented that
during the 1990s IRS examiners were seeking prime plus 2% as the
standard.
The IRS has indicated that they would
enforce any safe harbor regulation released by the DOL regarding
the interest rate for plan loans.
Unfortunately plan sponsors must use
their best judgment until such regulations are proposed by the
DOL.
FORM 5500 DEADLINE APPROACHES FOR
CALENDAR YEAR PLANS
ERISA generally requires the
administrator of an employer sponsored Qualified Retirement Plan
to submit an annual report which contains information on the
characteristics and financial operations of the plan. This annual
report is completed on Form 5500 and is filed with the Department
of Labor�s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). EBSA
provides information from the reports to the IRS and Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) for use in enforcement.
The Form 5500 is generally due by the
last day of the seventh month after the end of the plan year.
Thus, the deadline for 2006 calendar year plans is July 31, 2007.
One of the most serious offenses that a plan sponsor or plan
administrator can commit is failure to file Form 5500. The IRS can
impose a penalty of $25 per day up to $15,000, and the Department
of Labor and the PBGC can each charge up to $1,100 per day. Also,
any incorrect
|
|
or inconsistent data could trigger an audit of the plan and could
ultimately disqualify the tax-deferred status of the plan.
For more information about the Form
5500 filing, go to the EBSA website at www.dol.gov/ebsa or call
1-866-444-3272.
IRS AND DOL FORM 5500 FILING TIPS
The IRS and Department of Labor (DOL)
have compiled a list of the most frequent Form 5500 filing errors.
� Failure to sign and date the form
and any schedules that require a signature.
� Failure to provide the proper
Employee Identification Number (EIN) and Plan Number.
� Filing for a period of more than 12
months.
� Filing a Form 5500 as a "Final
Return/Report" if the plan has assets, liabilities, or
participants at the end of the plan year.
� Failure to provide a proper business
code � a listing of business codes is provided in the Form 5500
Instructions booklet.
� Failure to provide the correct plan
characteristic codes � a listing of characteristic codes is
provided in the Form 5500 Instructions booklet.
� Failure to file all applicable
schedules and attachments.
� Failure to file the appropriate
Financial Information schedule. Schedule I is generally for plans
with 100 or fewer participants, while Schedule H is for plans with
more than 100 participants.
� Incomplete Form 5500.
Additional information can be found in
the DOL�s Trouble Shooter�s Guide to Filing the ERISA Annual
Report (Form 5500), which is available on the DOL web site at
www.dol.gov/ebsa.
|
COMMON 404(c) MISTAKES
Section 404(c) of ERISA protects a
qualified plan fiduciary against liability for investment losses
arising from investment choices and asset allocations. While most
plan sponsors comply with 404(c) by allowing the participants to
direct the investments of their accounts in a broad range of
investment alternatives, many fail to comply with other aspects of
404(c). According to ERISA Attorneys Fred Reish and Bruce Ashton (www.reish.com),
the following are some of the 404(c) requirements that plans
commonly fail to satisfy:
1. Failure to tell participants that
the plan intends to comply with 404(c). If a plan fails to state
that it intends to comply with 404(c) and that by complying this
will relieve fiduciaries of liability for participant investment
decisions, the fiduciaries lose 404(c) protection even if all of
the requirements are met. Starting next year, this statement must
be in the plan�s Summary Plan Description (SPD).
2. Failure to inform the participants
of the fiduciary responsible for ensuring 404(c) compliance and
for providing information about the plan, such as a plan document
or prospectus. The regulations require that participants be given
the name, address, and phone number of this fiduciary. In many
cases the fiduciary will be named in the SPD by their position,
e.g., Benefits Director, rather than by name.
3. Failure to give participants copies
of fund prospectuses and information regarding the exercise of
voting, tender, and similar shareholder rights where a plan
invests directly in designated mutual funds. Under the regulation,
the plan must provide these materials only if they are received
from the mutual fund. Federal securities laws require mutual funds
to send this information to shareholders, and a qualified plan is
a "shareholder."
By complying with 404(c), plan
sponsors can transfer the legal responsibility for investment
decisions to the participants. It is important to note that 404(c)
does not relieve fiduciaries of all liability of plan investments.
The fiduciaries remain responsible for selecting and monitoring
the plan�s investment options. Plan sponsors should review their
404(c) compliance procedures to ensure they are not committing any
breaches.
|
The information contained in this
newsletter has been carefully compiled from sources believed to be
reliable, but the accuracy of the information is not guaranteed.
This newsletter is distributed with the understanding that the
publisher is not engaging in any legal or accounting type of work
such as practicing law or CPA services.
S TIFEL,
NICOLAUS &
COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
Member SIPC and New York
Stock Exchange, Inc.
National Headquarters: One
Financial Plaza � 501 North Broadway � St. Louis, Missouri 63102
(314) 342-2000 �
www.stifel.com
Investment Services Since 1890 |
|
|
|