ROLLOVER
CENTER |
|
|
STIFEL |
Retirement |
NICOLAUS |
Plans Quarterly |
1st Quarter 2007 |
First Quarter 2007
IRA CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 2006 AND 2007
Contributions to Traditional and Roth IRAs
for the 2006 tax year can be made until (and including) Tuesday, April
17, 2007 (April 15 falls on Sunday and April 16 is a legal holiday for
the District of Columbia). Contributions to Traditional or Roth IRAs
are limited to the lesser of:
� 100 percent of earned income or
� $4,000 for 2006 and 2007
Catch-up contributions
Individuals age 50 or older by December 31
in the tax year for which the contribution is intended may make an
additional $1,000 "catch-up" contribution for 2006 and 2007.
Spousal contribution
A Spousal IRA contribution may be made for
a spouse with no earned income if the following conditions are met
(IRC Sec. 219(c)):
� The couple must be married and filing a
joint tax return (special rules apply to married couples filing
separate returns).
� An IRA is established for a spouse who
has no earned income.
� The spouse receiving the contribution
must be under the age of 70 1/2 for the year in which the contribution
is made (applies to Traditional IRA, not Roth IRA).
If the requirements are met, the annual
combined IRA contribution limit for 2006 or 2007 is the lesser of
$8,000 or 100 percent of the working spouse�s earned income. If either
spouse is age 50 or older, that spouse will be entitled to an
additional $1,000 catch-up contribution to increase the 2006 and 2007
combined contribution limit to $10,000 for each year.
Traditional IRA deductibility
The tax deduction for a traditional IRA
contribution is based on whether an individual is an "active
participant" in a qualified retirement plan (QRP), 403(b), SEP, or
SIMPLE IRA. If so, the individual�s tax return filing status and his
or her adjusted gross income (AGI) is also considered (IRC Sec.
219(g)). If a single individual is not an active participant in an
employer-sponsored retirement plan, eligible contributions, regardless
of the individual�s income, are fully deductible. For married couples
filing a joint return, if neither spouse is an active participant in a
plan, contributions for each are tax-deductible.
Single filers
For the tax year 2006, if a single
individual is an active participant and has AGI of $50,000 ($52,000
for 2007) or less, his or her contribution is fully deductible. A
partial deduction is allowed if his or her AGI is between $50,000 and
$60,000 ($52,000 - $62,000 for 2007). No deduction is allowed for an
individual with AGI over $60,000 ($62,000 for 2007).
|
|
Married filers treated independently
If one spouse is an active participant and
the other is not, both individuals� deductions are subject to
different joint AGI limits. For the spouse who is not an active plan
participant, a fully deductible 2006 contribution is allowed with
joint AGI of $75,000 ($83,000 for 2007) or less. A partial deduction
is available for AGI between $75,000 and $85,000 ($83,000 - $103,000
for 2007). No deduction is allowed for a spouse who is an active
participant with AGI over $85,000 ($103,000 for 2007).
The spouse who is not an active
participant may make a fully deductible 2006 contribution if the
couple�s AGI is $150,000 ($156,000 for 2007) or less. A partial
deduction is allowed if the AGI is between $150,000 and $160,000
($156,000 - $166,000 for 2007).
|
|
Roth contributions
Contributions to Roth IRAs are always
non-deductible, and active participation status in a QRP is
not a consideration. The following income levels apply for
contribution eligibility:
� Single individuals are eligible to
make a maximum contribution for 2006 if their AGI does not exceed
$95,000 ($99,000 for 2007). Partial contributions are allowed for
AGI between $95,000 and $110,000 ($99,000 - $114,000 for 2007).
� Married couples filing jointly are
eligible to make a maximum contribution for 2006 if their AGI does
not exceed $150,000 ($156,000 for 2007). A partial contribution
may be made if AGI is between $150,000 and $160,000 ($156,000 -
$166,000 for 2007).
Traditional and Roth aggregate
The aggregate total of all
contributions to both Traditional and Roth IRAs for 2006 and 2007
may not exceed $4,000 per individual per year, or $8,000 per
married couple, plus catch-up contributions if applicable.
Contribution deadlines
Contributions must be made either
during the calendar year for which the contribution is desired or
by the tax return due date of that year, not including
extensions (IRC Sec. 219(f)(3) and 408A(c)(7)). The tax return
deadline for the 2006 tax year is Tuesday, April 17, 2007.
SEP IRAs CAN STILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR
2006
An employer must establish a Qualified
Retirement Plan (QRP) by the end of the tax year for which a tax
deduction is taken (Rev. Rul. 76-28). If an employer�s tax year is
based upon the calendar year, December 31, 2006 was the last day a
QRP could be established for 2006. However, employers have until
the due date of their federal income tax return for the business,
including extensions, to establish a Simplified Employee Pension
Plan (SEP) and make SEP contributions (Prop. Treas. Reg.
1.408-7(b): IRC Sec. 404(h)).
Eligible Employers
Most types of employers are eligible
to establish SEP IRAs, including sole proprietorships,
partnerships, S or C corporations, and certain other non-profit
and tax-exempt entities. The SEP may be an attractive alternative
to the Profit Sharing Plan for small business owners.
Contributions
The maximum amount that can be
contributed annually on behalf of SEP participants is the
lesser of:
� 25 percent of compensation (IRC Sec.
402(h) limit) up to the compensation cap of $220,000 for 2006
($225,000 for 2007) or
� $44,000 ($45,000 for 2007) (IRC Sec.
415(c) dollar limitation)
Benefits
There are several distinct benefits
associated with SEPs, such as: |
1. They may be established and funded
by the business owner�s tax filing deadline (plus extensions)
2. Contributions flow directly into
eligible participant�s SEP IRA accounts
3. No IRS Form 5500 reports required
4. Little administration resulting in
low fees
It�s not too late for small business
owners to take advantage of a new SEP plan for 2006.
CONTROLLED GROUP ISSUES
Business owners who have ownership in
more than one company may have to combine the companies for
purposes of offering retirement plan contributions. A certain
amount of overlap in ownership may deem the companies a
"controlled group" of corporations which would require the
separate companies to be treated as one company for retirement
plan purposes.
Definition of a Controlled Group
Two or more trades or businesses under
common control � related through common ownership interests � make
up a controlled group. Certain related employers (trades or
businesses under common control) are treated as a single employer.
These related employers include controlled groups of corporations,
partnerships, or sole proprietorships.*
Types of Controlled Groups
There are three basis types of
controlled groups:
1. Parent-Subsidiary � A parent
organization and one or more subsidiary organizations.
2. Brother-Sister Controlled Groups �
Persons who have ownership interest in more than one organization.
3. Combined Controlled Group � A
common parent organization from the parent-subsidiary controlled
group is also a member of a brother-sister controlled group
(Treas. Reg 1.313(c)-2(d)).
Determining ownership
To determine if a business is a member
of a controlled group, ownership of each business must be
determined. Business owners must consider the following two
questions:
1. What individuals or other entities
have ownership interests in the business and what percent of
ownership?
2. What, if any, ownership interest
does the business owner have in other businesses?
Who�s the employer?
Rules governing controlled groups are
designed to prevent employers from discriminating against rank and
file employees. Business owners should be aware of control group
issues; however, making a determination as to whether they are, in
fact, a control group can be complex and should be left to their
tax advisor or attorney.
For more information regarding
controlled group issues, visit www.benefitslink.com � Q&A Columns
� "Who�s the Employer."
*Treasury Regulation 1.414(c)-2 |
|
DOL ISSUES GUIDANCE ON PPA�S
INVESTMENT ADVICE
On February 2, 2007, the Department of
Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2007-01, which
provides guidance on the Investment Advice and Fiduciary
Investment Adviser exemptions outlined in the Pension Protection
Act (PPA).
PPA contains an ERISA prohibited
transaction exemption for investment advice provided by a
"fiduciary adviser" under an "eligible investment advice
arrangement." A "fiduciary adviser" is defined as a registered
investment company, bank, insurance company, or registered
broker-dealer. An "eligible investment advice arrangement" must
meet one of two criteria: (1) provide that the fees received by
the fiduciary adviser do not vary on the basis of which investment
options are chosen; or (2) recommendations are based on a computer
model meeting certain DOL criteria and the model is approved by an
independent third party. An annual audit of either approach is
required by PPA.
The Bulletin declared that as long as
the plan sponsor or other fiduciary prudently selects and monitors
a fiduciary adviser, the plan sponsor or fiduciary will not be
liable for the advice furnished by the fiduciary adviser to the
plan�s participants and beneficiaries, whether or not that advice
complies with the prohibited transaction exemption for an
"eligible investment advice arrangement."
Although the plan sponsor or other
fiduciaries do not have a duty under ERISA to monitor the
fiduciary adviser�s specific investment advice, they do have a
fiduciary responsibility to prudently select and periodically
review the selected fiduciary adviser.
In regards to the selection process,
the DOL commented that "a fiduciary should engage in an objective
process that is designed to elicit information necessary to assess
the provider�s qualifications, quality of services offered, and
reasonableness of fees charged for the service. The process also
must avoid self dealing, conflicts of interest, or other improper
influence."
The DOL also outlined criteria for
monitoring fiduciary advisers. Here are the items that the plan
sponsor or other fiduciaries should consider when monitoring a
fiduciary adviser.
� Have there been any changes in the
information that served as the basis for the initial selection of
the fiduciary adviser?
� Does the fiduciary adviser continue
to meet applicable federal and state securities law requirements?
� Is the advice being furnished to
participants and beneficiaries based upon generally accepted
investment theories?
� Is the fiduciary adviser complying
with the contractual provisions of the engagement?
� Are the investment advice services
being utilized by the participants in relation to the cost of the
services to the plan?
� Are participants� comments and
complaints about the quality of the investment advice being
considered and addressed?
Not only did the DOL issue guidelines
for plan sponsors, but it also provided the expectations of the
fiduciary adviser. The DOL said it expects that fiduciary advisers
"will maintain, and be able to demonstrate compliance with,
policies and procedures designed
|
to ensure that fees and compensation paid to fiduciary advisers,
at both the entity and individual level, do not vary on the basis
of any investment option selected. Moreover, it is anticipated
that compliance with such policies will be reviewed as part of the
annual audit required by section 408(g)(5)(A) and addressed in the
report referred to in section 408(g)(5)(B)."
This guidance will help plan sponsors
clearly understand their duty to monitor fiduciary advisers to
ensure that fiduciary advisers are operating within the confines
of the "eligible investment advice arrangement."
IRS CLARIFIES PPA DISTRIBUTION
PROVISIONS
On January 10, 2007, the IRS released
Notice 2007-7, which generally clarifies an assortment of
distribution provisions under the Pension Protection Act (PPA).
Non-spouse Beneficiary Rollover.
PPA includes a provision that now allows
non-spouse beneficiaries the option to directly roll over any
portion of a Qualified Plan distribution from an eligible
retirement plan, which includes 401Ks, 403(b)s, and 457(b)s, to
an "inherited IRA." The IRA must be registered in a manner that
identifies the decedent and the beneficiary. The provision applies
to distributions made after December 31, 2006, regardless of the
date of the participant�s death. The Notice indicates that a plan
is not required to offer the non-spouse rollover option. According
to the Notice, however, the non-spouse rollover option is a right
or feature, which if offered, must be available on a
nondiscriminatory basis.
A non-spouse beneficiary rollover is
not treated as an eligible rollover distribution under the
Internal Revenue Code and, thus, is not subject to notice
requirements or the mandatory 20% withholding requirements. In
addition, the Notice specifically states that a non-spouse
beneficiary rollover must be direct and, thus, cannot be rolled
over within 60 days if distributed directly to the non-spouse
beneficiary.
The Notice also includes rules for
determining the required minimum distribution amount under these
circumstances.
Hardship Distributions.
PPA modified the hardship distribution rules such
that a 401K or 403(b) plan using the "safe harbor" hardship
provision may, but is not required to, provide a distribution to a
participant based on the hardship of the participant�s primary
benefi ciary, in addition to the participant, participant�s
spouse, or dependent of the participant. The hardship events which
qualify for the beneficiary hardship provision include medical,
educational, and funeral expenses. The primary beneficiary is
defined as the beneficiary named under the plan and who has an
unconditional right to some or all of the participant�s account
upon the participant�s death. A contingent or secondary
beneficiary does not qualify under the provision.
Distribution Notices.
PPA extended the timing requirements for
distribution notices from 90 days to no less than 30 days and no
more than 180 days before the commencement of annuity
distributions. The change means that a distribution notice may
remain in effect for up to 180 days. The notice must include a
statement of the participant�s right to defer a distribution and a
description of the consequences of failing to defer receipt of a
distribution. The IRS Notice has provided a safe harbor if the
"description of
|
|
the consequences" is written in a
manner reasonably calculated to be understood by the average
participant.
Distributions From IRAs to Charitable
Organizations. PPA permits an IRA owner
who is 70 � or older to directly transfer tax-free, up to $100,000
per year (2006 and 2007 only) to a qualified charity. The Notice
clarified a few issues regarding qualified charitable
contributions. First, a qualified charitable contribution may be
taken from any type of IRA (except from a SEP or SIMPLE IRA in
which an employer contributes for the taxable year of the
qualified charitable contribution) and will not be subject to
withholding.
Secondly, the $100,000 annual limit
applies per individual IRA owner, even if the owner has multiple
IRAs. If married, the $100,000 annual limit applies separately for
each spouse.
Finally, the Notice provides that any
charitable contribution made directly from an IRA that fails to
meet the qualified charitable distribution rules will be included
in the IRA owner�s gross income, subject to the charitable
deduction rules.
Vesting of Nonelective Contributions.
PPA provides for accelerated vesting
requirements for employer nonelective contributions to defined
contribution plans. Under the new rules, a defined contribution
plan satisfies the minimum vesting requirements for a nonelective
contribution if it has a three-year cliff or six-year graded
vesting schedule. The Notice makes it clear that the accelerated
vesting schedule applies only to nonelective contributions made
for plan years after December 31, 2006. A plan can use a
"bifurcated" vesting schedule that applies the new vesting rules
to post-2006 contributions or a single schedule that applies to
all contributions.
CONGRESS EXAMINING 401K FEES
Given that the 401K has become the
largest source of retirement savings in America, Congress and
government regulators are planning to strengthen oversight of
these accounts, specifically with regard to fees.
Democratic Representative George
Miller of California, the new chairman of the House committee that
has authority over retirement matters, plans to hold hearings on
401K fees this year. The goal of the committee�s hearings is to
ensure that the financial security of older Americans is not
undermined by excessive 401K fees and explore ways to encourage
employers to retain traditional pension plans. |
"All of these fees and commissions, all of these charges at some
point end up coming out of the 401K owner�s account," said
Miller. "I think we have an obligation to make sure that those
costs are proper."
Rep. Miller isn�t the only one
focusing on 401K fees. The Department of Labor (DOL) is planning
three initiatives to make 401K fees more transparent. The DOL
initiatives are in different planning stages, but proposals to
improve transparency are expected in the spring.
As a fiduciary, employers should have
a prudent process in place for reviewing plan expenses.
Unfortunately, many employers find it difficult to identify all of
the fees charged to their 401K plan even if the information is
publicly available.
And it isn�t just Congress and
government regulators who are eyeing 401K fees, litigators are
filing class action complaints against 401K plans and the
fiduciaries who administer those plans. The plaintiffs in the
cases allege that the plans� fiduciaries breached their ERISA
duties by allowing their plans to pay excessive fees and expenses
to service providers. Specifically, the majority of the suits
claim that the plans� fiduciaries had a duty to know about the
revenue sharing arrangements that their plan providers were
entering into with investment managers, and should have used that
knowledge to negotiate lower plan fees.
All of this will likely increase
fiduciary due diligence and scrutiny of fees, expenses, and
revenue sharing arrangements.
DOL MANDATES E-FILING FOR 2008 FORM
5500
The Department of Labor (DOL) has made
electronic filing of Form 5500 mandatory for plan years beginning
on or after January 1, 2008. The DOL believes that e-filing will
lead to fewer errors on the returns and decrease the potential for
penalties to filers. In addition, e-filing will allow for
information to be disclosed to the public in a timelier manner.
Plan administrators will likely have
to spend time and money to implement the new technology in time
for the 2008 filing. Public comments are supportive of e-filing,
but many have expressed concern over the timing of the mandate. A
"phase-in period," which would allow a voluntary e-filing period,
was suggested to the DOL, but the DOL believes that such a period
would be costly and inefficient. To address the timing concerns,
the DOL does plan to take into account any technical and
logistical obstacles when deciding whether or not to assess civil
penalties related to the Form 5500 filing. |
The information contained in this
newsletter has been carefully compiled from sources believed to be
reliable, but the accuracy of the information is not guaranteed.
This newsletter is distributed with the understanding that the
publisher is not engaging in any legal or accounting type of work
such as practicing law or CPA services.
S TIFEL,
NICOLAUS &
COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
Member SIPC and New York
Stock Exchange, Inc.
National Headquarters: One
Financial Plaza � 501 North Broadway � St. Louis, Missouri 63102
(314) 342-2000 �
www.stifel.com
Investment Services Since 1890 |
|
|
|