Stifel Client Account Access:  LOG IN          ● 1 Consolidate 2 Manage 3 Retire Well ●                    Contact Us

  ROLLOVER CENTER
   
  STIFEL                Retirement
  NICOLAUS                 Plans Quarterly
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Quarter 2007

 

                                                                            First Quarter 2007

IRA CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 2006 AND 2007

Contributions to Traditional and Roth IRAs for the 2006 tax year can be made until (and including) Tuesday, April 17, 2007 (April 15 falls on Sunday and April 16 is a legal holiday for the District of Columbia). Contributions to Traditional or Roth IRAs are limited to the lesser of:

� 100 percent of earned income or

� $4,000 for 2006 and 2007

Catch-up contributions

Individuals age 50 or older by December 31 in the tax year for which the contribution is intended may make an additional $1,000 "catch-up" contribution for 2006 and 2007.

Spousal contribution

A Spousal IRA contribution may be made for a spouse with no earned income if the following conditions are met (IRC Sec. 219(c)):

� The couple must be married and filing a joint tax return (special rules apply to married couples filing separate returns).

� An IRA is established for a spouse who has no earned income.

� The spouse receiving the contribution must be under the age of 70 1/2 for the year in which the contribution is made (applies to Traditional IRA, not Roth IRA).

If the requirements are met, the annual combined IRA contribution limit for 2006 or 2007 is the lesser of $8,000 or 100 percent of the working spouse�s earned income. If either spouse is age 50 or older, that spouse will be entitled to an additional $1,000 catch-up contribution to increase the 2006 and 2007 combined contribution limit to $10,000 for each year.

Traditional IRA deductibility

The tax deduction for a traditional IRA contribution is based on whether an individual is an "active participant" in a qualified retirement plan (QRP), 403(b), SEP, or SIMPLE IRA. If so, the individual�s tax return filing status and his or her adjusted gross income (AGI) is also considered (IRC Sec. 219(g)). If a single individual is not an active participant in an employer-sponsored retirement plan, eligible contributions, regardless of the individual�s income, are fully deductible. For married couples filing a joint return, if neither spouse is an active participant in a plan, contributions for each are tax-deductible.

Single filers

For the tax year 2006, if a single individual is an active participant and has AGI of $50,000 ($52,000 for 2007) or less, his or her contribution is fully deductible. A partial deduction is allowed if his or her AGI is between $50,000 and $60,000 ($52,000 - $62,000 for 2007). No deduction is allowed for an individual with AGI over $60,000 ($62,000 for 2007).

 

     

Married filers treated independently

If one spouse is an active participant and the other is not, both individuals� deductions are subject to different joint AGI limits. For the spouse who is not an active plan participant, a fully deductible 2006 contribution is allowed with joint AGI of $75,000 ($83,000 for 2007) or less. A partial deduction is available for AGI between $75,000 and $85,000 ($83,000 - $103,000 for 2007). No deduction is allowed for a spouse who is an active participant with AGI over $85,000 ($103,000 for 2007).

The spouse who is not an active participant may make a fully deductible 2006 contribution if the couple�s AGI is $150,000 ($156,000 for 2007) or less. A partial deduction is allowed if the AGI is between $150,000 and $160,000 ($156,000 - $166,000 for 2007).

 

Roth contributions

Contributions to Roth IRAs are always non-deductible, and active participation status in a QRP is not a consideration. The following income levels apply for contribution eligibility:

� Single individuals are eligible to make a maximum contribution for 2006 if their AGI does not exceed $95,000 ($99,000 for 2007). Partial contributions are allowed for AGI between $95,000 and $110,000 ($99,000 - $114,000 for 2007).

� Married couples filing jointly are eligible to make a maximum contribution for 2006 if their AGI does not exceed $150,000 ($156,000 for 2007). A partial contribution may be made if AGI is between $150,000 and $160,000 ($156,000 - $166,000 for 2007).

Traditional and Roth aggregate

The aggregate total of all contributions to both Traditional and Roth IRAs for 2006 and 2007 may not exceed $4,000 per individual per year, or $8,000 per married couple, plus catch-up contributions if applicable.

Contribution deadlines

Contributions must be made either during the calendar year for which the contribution is desired or by the tax return due date of that year, not including extensions (IRC Sec. 219(f)(3) and 408A(c)(7)). The tax return deadline for the 2006 tax year is Tuesday, April 17, 2007.

SEP IRAs CAN STILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR 2006

An employer must establish a Qualified Retirement Plan (QRP) by the end of the tax year for which a tax deduction is taken (Rev. Rul. 76-28). If an employer�s tax year is based upon the calendar year, December 31, 2006 was the last day a QRP could be established for 2006. However, employers have until the due date of their federal income tax return for the business, including extensions, to establish a Simplified Employee Pension Plan (SEP) and make SEP contributions (Prop. Treas. Reg. 1.408-7(b): IRC Sec. 404(h)).

Eligible Employers

Most types of employers are eligible to establish SEP IRAs, including sole proprietorships, partnerships, S or C corporations, and certain other non-profit and tax-exempt entities. The SEP may be an attractive alternative to the Profit Sharing Plan for small business owners.

Contributions

The maximum amount that can be contributed annually on behalf of SEP participants is the lesser of:

� 25 percent of compensation (IRC Sec. 402(h) limit) up to the compensation cap of $220,000 for 2006 ($225,000 for 2007) or

� $44,000 ($45,000 for 2007) (IRC Sec. 415(c) dollar limitation)

Benefits

There are several distinct benefits associated with SEPs, such as:

1. They may be established and funded by the business owner�s tax filing deadline (plus extensions)

2. Contributions flow directly into eligible participant�s SEP IRA accounts

3. No IRS Form 5500 reports required

4. Little administration resulting in low fees

It�s not too late for small business owners to take advantage of a new SEP plan for 2006.

CONTROLLED GROUP ISSUES

Business owners who have ownership in more than one company may have to combine the companies for purposes of offering retirement plan contributions. A certain amount of overlap in ownership may deem the companies a "controlled group" of corporations which would require the separate companies to be treated as one company for retirement plan purposes.

Definition of a Controlled Group

Two or more trades or businesses under common control � related through common ownership interests � make up a controlled group. Certain related employers (trades or businesses under common control) are treated as a single employer. These related employers include controlled groups of corporations, partnerships, or sole proprietorships.*

Types of Controlled Groups

There are three basis types of controlled groups:

1. Parent-Subsidiary � A parent organization and one or more subsidiary organizations.

2. Brother-Sister Controlled Groups � Persons who have ownership interest in more than one organization.

3. Combined Controlled Group � A common parent organization from the parent-subsidiary controlled group is also a member of a brother-sister controlled group (Treas. Reg 1.313(c)-2(d)).

Determining ownership

To determine if a business is a member of a controlled group, ownership of each business must be determined. Business owners must consider the following two questions:

1. What individuals or other entities have ownership interests in the business and what percent of ownership?

2. What, if any, ownership interest does the business owner have in other businesses?

Who�s the employer?

Rules governing controlled groups are designed to prevent employers from discriminating against rank and file employees. Business owners should be aware of control group issues; however, making a determination as to whether they are, in fact, a control group can be complex and should be left to their tax advisor or attorney.

For more information regarding controlled group issues, visit www.benefitslink.com � Q&A Columns � "Who�s the Employer."

*Treasury Regulation 1.414(c)-2

 

DOL ISSUES GUIDANCE ON PPA�S INVESTMENT ADVICE

On February 2, 2007, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2007-01, which provides guidance on the Investment Advice and Fiduciary Investment Adviser exemptions outlined in the Pension Protection Act (PPA).

PPA contains an ERISA prohibited transaction exemption for investment advice provided by a "fiduciary adviser" under an "eligible investment advice arrangement." A "fiduciary adviser" is defined as a registered investment company, bank, insurance company, or registered broker-dealer. An "eligible investment advice arrangement" must meet one of two criteria: (1) provide that the fees received by the fiduciary adviser do not vary on the basis of which investment options are chosen; or (2) recommendations are based on a computer model meeting certain DOL criteria and the model is approved by an independent third party. An annual audit of either approach is required by PPA.

The Bulletin declared that as long as the plan sponsor or other fiduciary prudently selects and monitors a fiduciary adviser, the plan sponsor or fiduciary will not be liable for the advice furnished by the fiduciary adviser to the plan�s participants and beneficiaries, whether or not that advice complies with the prohibited transaction exemption for an "eligible investment advice arrangement."

Although the plan sponsor or other fiduciaries do not have a duty under ERISA to monitor the fiduciary adviser�s specific investment advice, they do have a fiduciary responsibility to prudently select and periodically review the selected fiduciary adviser.

In regards to the selection process, the DOL commented that "a fiduciary should engage in an objective process that is designed to elicit information necessary to assess the provider�s qualifications, quality of services offered, and reasonableness of fees charged for the service. The process also must avoid self dealing, conflicts of interest, or other improper influence."

The DOL also outlined criteria for monitoring fiduciary advisers. Here are the items that the plan sponsor or other fiduciaries should consider when monitoring a fiduciary adviser.

� Have there been any changes in the information that served as the basis for the initial selection of the fiduciary adviser?

� Does the fiduciary adviser continue to meet applicable federal and state securities law requirements?

� Is the advice being furnished to participants and beneficiaries based upon generally accepted investment theories?

� Is the fiduciary adviser complying with the contractual provisions of the engagement?

� Are the investment advice services being utilized by the participants in relation to the cost of the services to the plan?

� Are participants� comments and complaints about the quality of the investment advice being considered and addressed?

Not only did the DOL issue guidelines for plan sponsors, but it also provided the expectations of the fiduciary adviser. The DOL said it expects that fiduciary advisers "will maintain, and be able to demonstrate compliance with, policies and procedures designed

 

 

to ensure that fees and compensation paid to fiduciary advisers, at both the entity and individual level, do not vary on the basis of any investment option selected. Moreover, it is anticipated that compliance with such policies will be reviewed as part of the annual audit required by section 408(g)(5)(A) and addressed in the report referred to in section 408(g)(5)(B)."

This guidance will help plan sponsors clearly understand their duty to monitor fiduciary advisers to ensure that fiduciary advisers are operating within the confines of the "eligible investment advice arrangement."

IRS CLARIFIES PPA DISTRIBUTION PROVISIONS

On January 10, 2007, the IRS released Notice 2007-7, which generally clarifies an assortment of distribution provisions under the Pension Protection Act (PPA).

Non-spouse Beneficiary Rollover. PPA includes a provision that now allows non-spouse beneficiaries the option to directly roll over any portion of a Qualified Plan distribution from an eligible retirement plan, which includes 401Ks, 403(b)s, and 457(b)s, to an "inherited IRA." The IRA must be registered in a manner that identifies the decedent and the beneficiary. The provision applies to distributions made after December 31, 2006, regardless of the date of the participant�s death. The Notice indicates that a plan is not required to offer the non-spouse rollover option. According to the Notice, however, the non-spouse rollover option is a right or feature, which if offered, must be available on a nondiscriminatory basis.

A non-spouse beneficiary rollover is not treated as an eligible rollover distribution under the Internal Revenue Code and, thus, is not subject to notice requirements or the mandatory 20% withholding requirements. In addition, the Notice specifically states that a non-spouse beneficiary rollover must be direct and, thus, cannot be rolled over within 60 days if distributed directly to the non-spouse beneficiary.

The Notice also includes rules for determining the required minimum distribution amount under these circumstances.

Hardship Distributions. PPA modified the hardship distribution rules such that a 401K or 403(b) plan using the "safe harbor" hardship provision may, but is not required to, provide a distribution to a participant based on the hardship of the participant�s primary benefi ciary, in addition to the participant, participant�s spouse, or dependent of the participant. The hardship events which qualify for the beneficiary hardship provision include medical, educational, and funeral expenses. The primary beneficiary is defined as the beneficiary named under the plan and who has an unconditional right to some or all of the participant�s account upon the participant�s death. A contingent or secondary beneficiary does not qualify under the provision.

Distribution Notices. PPA extended the timing requirements for distribution notices from 90 days to no less than 30 days and no more than 180 days before the commencement of annuity distributions. The change means that a distribution notice may remain in effect for up to 180 days. The notice must include a statement of the participant�s right to defer a distribution and a description of the consequences of failing to defer receipt of a distribution. The IRS Notice has provided a safe harbor if the "description of

 

the consequences" is written in a manner reasonably calculated to be understood by the average participant.

Distributions From IRAs to Charitable Organizations. PPA permits an IRA owner who is 70 � or older to directly transfer tax-free, up to $100,000 per year (2006 and 2007 only) to a qualified charity. The Notice clarified a few issues regarding qualified charitable contributions. First, a qualified charitable contribution may be taken from any type of IRA (except from a SEP or SIMPLE IRA in which an employer contributes for the taxable year of the qualified charitable contribution) and will not be subject to withholding.

Secondly, the $100,000 annual limit applies per individual IRA owner, even if the owner has multiple IRAs. If married, the $100,000 annual limit applies separately for each spouse.

Finally, the Notice provides that any charitable contribution made directly from an IRA that fails to meet the qualified charitable distribution rules will be included in the IRA owner�s gross income, subject to the charitable deduction rules.

Vesting of Nonelective Contributions. PPA provides for accelerated vesting requirements for employer nonelective contributions to defined contribution plans. Under the new rules, a defined contribution plan satisfies the minimum vesting requirements for a nonelective contribution if it has a three-year cliff or six-year graded vesting schedule. The Notice makes it clear that the accelerated vesting schedule applies only to nonelective contributions made for plan years after December 31, 2006. A plan can use a "bifurcated" vesting schedule that applies the new vesting rules to post-2006 contributions or a single schedule that applies to all contributions.

CONGRESS EXAMINING 401K FEES

Given that the 401K has become the largest source of retirement savings in America, Congress and government regulators are planning to strengthen oversight of these accounts, specifically with regard to fees.

Democratic Representative George Miller of California, the new chairman of the House committee that has authority over retirement matters, plans to hold hearings on 401K fees this year. The goal of the committee�s hearings is to ensure that the financial security of older Americans is not undermined by excessive 401K fees and explore ways to encourage employers to retain traditional pension plans.

 

"All of these fees and commissions, all of these charges at some point end up coming out of the 401K owner�s account," said Miller. "I think we have an obligation to make sure that those costs are proper."

Rep. Miller isn�t the only one focusing on 401K fees. The Department of Labor (DOL) is planning three initiatives to make 401K fees more transparent. The DOL initiatives are in different planning stages, but proposals to improve transparency are expected in the spring.

As a fiduciary, employers should have a prudent process in place for reviewing plan expenses. Unfortunately, many employers find it difficult to identify all of the fees charged to their 401K plan even if the information is publicly available.

And it isn�t just Congress and government regulators who are eyeing 401K fees, litigators are filing class action complaints against 401K plans and the fiduciaries who administer those plans. The plaintiffs in the cases allege that the plans� fiduciaries breached their ERISA duties by allowing their plans to pay excessive fees and expenses to service providers. Specifically, the majority of the suits claim that the plans� fiduciaries had a duty to know about the revenue sharing arrangements that their plan providers were entering into with investment managers, and should have used that knowledge to negotiate lower plan fees.

All of this will likely increase fiduciary due diligence and scrutiny of fees, expenses, and revenue sharing arrangements.

DOL MANDATES E-FILING FOR 2008 FORM 5500

The Department of Labor (DOL) has made electronic filing of Form 5500 mandatory for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The DOL believes that e-filing will lead to fewer errors on the returns and decrease the potential for penalties to filers. In addition, e-filing will allow for information to be disclosed to the public in a timelier manner.

Plan administrators will likely have to spend time and money to implement the new technology in time for the 2008 filing. Public comments are supportive of e-filing, but many have expressed concern over the timing of the mandate. A "phase-in period," which would allow a voluntary e-filing period, was suggested to the DOL, but the DOL believes that such a period would be costly and inefficient. To address the timing concerns, the DOL does plan to take into account any technical and logistical obstacles when deciding whether or not to assess civil penalties related to the Form 5500 filing.

 

The information contained in this newsletter has been carefully compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy of the information is not guaranteed. This newsletter is distributed with the understanding that the publisher is not engaging in any legal or accounting type of work such as practicing law or CPA services.

STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED

Member SIPC and New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

National Headquarters: One Financial Plaza � 501 North Broadway � St. Louis, Missouri 63102

(314) 342-2000 � www.stifel.com

Investment Services Since 1890

          Rollover Center Home
  401(k) ROLLOVERS
      Order Rollover Kit
 What is a 401(k) Rollover?
 How Do I Start a Rollover?
  ROLLOVER IRAs
  Traditional IRA
  Roth IRA
  Which IRA is Best? 
  Investment Options
  Contribution Limits
  PLANNING
  Retirement Planning
  Estate Planning
  Wealth Tracker
  Wealth Strategist
  RESOURCES
  Search FAQs
  About Us