Stifel Client Account Access:  LOG IN          ● 1 Consolidate 2 Manage 3 Retire Well ●                    Contact Us

  ROLLOVER CENTER
   
                                STIFEL NICOLAUS
                 

  Investment           StrategistTM           

 

 

What Can a Presidential Election Year Mean for the Markets?       September 2008    

     

With the Presidential election just around the corner, much is being made about the candidates� plans for the economy. But do Presidential elections themselves have an impact on the stock market? Past performance certainly cannot guarantee future results, and economists may differ in their opinions as to how much politics influences the economy; however, historically, the financial markets have fared well during a Presidential election year.

The Presidential Election Cycle Theory

The Presidential Election Cycle is a theory that attempts to forecast the performance of the stock market. Developed by market historian Yale Hirsch, it posits that the stock market follows a cyclical performance that corresponds with the four-year Presidential term.

According to the Presidential Election Cycle theory, the market fluctuates in fairly regular patterns over the course of a Presidential term, with the first two years of the term tending to be the weakest. Years three (the pre-election) and four (the election year), according to the theory, typically offer stronger returns for the stock market.

S&P 500 Returns by U.S. Presidential Term Year, 1948-2007              

   Average           1st Year                    2nd Year                   3rd Year                 4th Year (Election Year)     Annual Return        7.35%                       10.16%                   22.29%                           12.18%

The gain/loss information on your account may have changed due to enhancements in Stifel� cost basis system. Gain/loss estimates are provided for informational purposes only, and should not be used for tax preparation without the assistance of your tax advisor. Cost basis may be adjusted for, among other items, amortization, accretion, principal paydowns, capital changes, or listed option premiums. Please contact your Financial Advisor with any questions.

V i s i o n      �      P l a n n i n g      �      Focus

SNINS060801

 
What Can a Presidential Election Year Mean for the Markets?
 

The assumptions of the Presidential Election Cycle theory are:                                                               � The stock market performs well in a Presidential election year.                                                          � The market does even better in the year preceding the election.                                                         � Years three and four of the Presidential term are typically the best-performing years of the cycle.        � The first two years of a Presidential term are typically the worst-performing years of the cycle.

Presidential Election Year Performance

Historically, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has recorded significant gains during the fourth year of a Presidential cycle, also known as the Presidential election year. The average Dow Jones performance during Presidential election years, since 1960, is a gain of 7.7%, with nine up years compared to three down years.

So why does the stock market typically do well in a Presidential election year? The answer, according to advocates of the theory, is relatively simple. According to Hirsch, the reason behind this cycle is that �incumbent administrations during election years try to make the economy look good.� During a Presidential election year, regardless of whether a Democrat or Republican is in office, the incumbents typically take actions to bolster the economy through tax cuts and higher spending. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve Board, which tries tore main neutral to politics, avoids raising or lowering rates during a Presidential election year. And, in theory, incumbents vying for reelection do their best to not upset the markets.

While Presidential election years, on average, have recorded profitable results for the markets, it is important to not discount the prior year�s performance. During the third year of a Presidential term, the calendar year before the Presidential election year, politicians are eager to pass legislation that will improve the economy before the reelection campaign officially kicks off. In the past four Presidential cycles alone, the average gain for the Dow Jones has been an impressive 26% during the third year of a Presidential term. And since the end of World War II, the S&P 500 has never suffered a loss in the full calendar year before a Presidential election. This held true in 2007, with the index up 4.8% for the year (despite the fact that it retreated toward the end of the year).

 

       Dow Jones Industrial Average for Election Years Since 1960     

    Election Year
President Election Year Performance Percentage
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Kennedy 1960 -9.3
Johnson 1964 +14.6
Nixon 1968 +4.3
Nixon 1972 +14.6
Carter 1976 +17.9
Reagan 1980 +14.9
Reagan 1984 -3.7
Bush, G.H.W. 1988 +11.8
Clinton 1992 +4.2
Clinton 1996 +26
Bush, G.W. 2000 -6.2
Bush.G.W. 2004 +3.1
     

 

 

Dangers of Attempting to Time the Market

While the Presidential Election Cycle theory has proven to be relatively consistent over the years, there simply is no foolproof way to predict the behavior of the market. George W. Bush�s election in 2000, for instance, occurred at the height of the dot com bust, which resulted in a bear market. The current election year is proving to be a turbulent one for the stock market as well.

Simply selling stock in the first two years of a Presidential term could cause you to miss out on significant returns � the S&P 500 gained 7.1% in Bill Clinton�s first year in office, for example. In years one and two of his second term, the S&P gained 31% and 26.7%, respectively. And by investing only in the years leading up to a Presidential election, you would not have been saved from �Black Monday� � October 19, 1987 � when the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 22.6% in one day.

There�s an old saying that successful investing comes from time in the market, not market timing. Many experts will also agree that determining the �best� time to get in or out of the market can be nearly impossible, and that for most investors, trying to time the market is not a practical investing strategy. Trying to determine exactly when one should aggressively invest or back out of the market takes a considerable amount of expertise and time to monitor market environments. And even the most savvy investors and advisors can�t guarantee that their predictions will be correct, since there are no guarantees how the financial markets will perform.

Action Items to Help Weather Turbulent Markets

Dollar-Cost Averaging

There may be an advantage to staying in the market for the long term, versus trying to determine specific times to get in or out of the market. This advantage can best be explained with the concept of dollar-cost averaging. Dollar-cost averaging is simply investing equal or fixed amounts of money at regularly scheduled intervals. With this investment strategy, you will buy more shares when the price of your investment has declined, and fewer shares when the price has risen. Over a period of time, you may lower your average cost. Whether you are new to investing or a seasoned professional, dollar-cost averaging can help you cope with price fluctuations in a volatile market.

By dollar-cost averaging, you may reduce investment risk by not investing substantial amounts at the wrong time. In addition, dollar-cost averaging forces you to invest on a regular basis, as you would in a 401K plan, for instance. By investing on a regular basis, you can avoid making bad decisions based on emotions, such as the natural tendency to stop investing in a weak market.

It is important to consider that dollar-cost averaging does not assure a profit or protect against a loss in declining markets. Before embracing the dollar-cost averaging strategy, you should consider your ability to continue investing during periods of falling prices.

Revisiting Your Asset Allocation Strategy

If you have any questions regarding your investment portfolio in light of current market conditions, you may wish to schedule a visit with your Stifel Financial Advisor to discuss whether your asset allocation plan is still consistent with your current situation, objectives, and risk tolerance. You may also wish to discuss incorporating the Stifel PACTProgram or Wealth Strategist Reportinto your investment strategy.

The Stifel PACTProgram is a four-step process that offers an assessment of your current and future resources, risk tolerance, and financial objectives. Following the assessment, Stifel will assist you in determining a proper asset allocation plan and your Financial Advisor will work with you to establish a customized investment program and conduct periodic reviews to ensure the program is meeting your objectives.

The Wealth Strategist Reportprovides an analysis of your current financial situation and goals, along with detailed strategies to assist you in various life-planning issues, such as education savings, retirement savings, and survivor income. This program incorporates an asset allocation plan as well as more comprehensive financial planning information to assist you in reaching your financial goals. These innovative resources can help set you on the right track to reaching your financial goals.

Account Disclosures

Rollover My 401k to an IRA

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated Member SIPC and New York Stock Exchange � One Financial Plaza, 501 North Broadway, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 � www.stifel.com

          Rollover Center Home
  401(k) ROLLOVERS
      Order Rollover Kit
 What is a 401(k) Rollover?
 How Do I Start a Rollover?
  ROLLOVER IRAs
  Traditional IRA
  Roth IRA
  Which IRA is Best? 
  Investment Options
  Contribution Limits
  PLANNING
  Retirement Planning
  Estate Planning
  Wealth Tracker
  Wealth Strategist
  RESOURCES
  Search FAQs
  About Us